Lesson 3 of 12 · 10 min
The Nernst equation
NCERT §2.3
The table promises 1.10 V for a Daniell cell, yet the stall's cell reads 1.13 V. Its only difference is a zinc solution of 0.10 M instead of 1 M. Why should a weaker solution push harder?
The lesson in notes
In short
For Mⁿ⁺(aq) + ne⁻ → M(s), the potential at a general concentration is E = E° − (RT/nF) ln(1/[Mⁿ⁺]), since a pure solid is taken as unity. R = 8.314 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹, F = 96487 C mol⁻¹, T in kelvin.
For the Daniell cell, E_cell = E°_cell − (RT/2F) ln([Zn²⁺]/[Cu²⁺]). The cell voltage rises when [Cu²⁺] is raised or [Zn²⁺] lowered.
At 298 K, with base-10 logs, RT/F × 2.303 = 0.059 V, so E_cell = E°_cell − (0.059/n) log Q.
For aA + bB + ne⁻ → cC + dD, Q = [C]^c[D]^d/[A]^a[B]^b, with pure solids and liquids left out. Use the same n for both electrodes: for Ni(s) + 2Ag⁺ → Ni²⁺ + 2Ag(s), n = 2 and Q = [Ni²⁺]/[Ag⁺]².
Worked: Mg|Mg²⁺(0.130 M)||Ag⁺(0.0001 M)|Ag with E° = 3.17 V gives E = 3.17 − (0.059/2) log(0.130/10⁻⁸) = 3.17 − 0.21 = 2.96 V.
A hydrogen electrode in a solution of pH 10 (at 1 bar H₂): E = −0.059 × pH = −0.59 V.
Watch a class
Prefer a video? Watch this
Using Nernst for cell potential problems
The Organic Chemistry Tutor · English · Solved problems · Open on YouTube